Adequate Coverage?
- Many people interpret "mandatory health insurance" to mean that every person must buy health insurance. But, here it's used to mean that every employer must buy insurance for their employees, a terrible idea!
- Employer-paid insurance runs into the problems of ERISA preemption, lack of portability (lose your job and you're uninsured), and then there's the issue of who pays to cover the unemployed.
- As far as "requiring everyone to buy insurance", I'm opposed to that too. Health care should be axiomatic. It should be automatic for every citizen, without them having to explicitly "buy" insurance—you don't have to explicitly pay for the fire department, do you?
- One of the biggest wastes of the current system is that one has to check each patient for their insurance coverage. That wouldn't be necessary with a universal system.
Of course, there's the other side, as well. John Stossel points to cost-control through long waiting lines and outright denials under government management. He warns us, don't believe polls from countries with socialized medicine taken when patients are well and not when they are in need. (See, "Better Health Care?")

Post new comment