|
Production
or Standard Reports in a CRG Format by Commercial,
Medicare, Medicaid Line of Business (LOB) Unless
Otherwise Specified, All Analyses are Performed at Each CRG Level of
Aggregation These
Reports are Variance Analyses Utilizing Comparative and Normative Statistics[1] They are
CRG-adjusted Rates and Adjusted Averages with Special Focus (Subset) Data[2] They Will Be Presented as a Compendium of Report Prototypes With Real, Sanitized Data |
![]()
First Level Analysis and Reporting
|
Parameter
(Baseline) |
Description |
|
|
1. |
Membership Correlates |
How many
continuously enrolled members are attributed to the group or physician
practice. This is the denominator of
the per member per month reports or the incidence or prevalence rates. It also allows subset comparisons by
member age and sex and by health plan type |
|
Parameter
(Baseline) |
Description |
|
|
2A. |
CRGs by Frequency |
Rank-ordered (R-O) the prevalence of Clinical Risk Groups |
|
2B. |
Healthy EDC and/or EPC by Prevalence |
R-O Healthy Episode Diagnostic/Procedure Cells[3]
for the 50 most frequent conditions |
|
2C. |
CRGs by Expenditure |
R-O per member per month (PMPM) of CRGs |
|
2D. |
Healthy EDC and/or EPC by Expenditure |
R-O Healthy Episode Diagnostic/Procedure Cells3 for the 50 most costly conditions |
|
Parameter (Baseline) |
Description |
|
|
3A. |
Case Mix Index Calculation - PCP |
Average
of the Payment Weights Assigned Each Enrollee |
|
3B. |
Case Mix Index Calculation by Subgroup and by Total Group |
By
System of Care, e.g., Integrated Delivery System; By configuration of a group
of practitioners, e.g., by enrollees in a primary care group; by Risk Group |
|
Parameter (UR/QI) |
Description |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4A. |
Actual to Predicted Ratios of Cost and Prevalence of CRGs or ACRGs (External data by LOB must be
used as a surrogate for the “Expected” parameter in first generation
reports.) |
Primary
or Specialty Care Report Card with For
__________________ Med. Group; Period
of Observation ___/___ -
___/___
* Each Physician’s
Panel size >500 Continuously enrolled members Fig. 1: Actual Verses Expected Reporting |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4B. |
E&M Codes by ACRG3 |
R-O Evaluation and Management CPT-4 Codes sorted
by the highest tier of data aggregation |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4C. |
Office visits by Patient by CRG or ACRG |
E&M
codes per ACRG/PCP PMPY; further refined and reported with respect to age
tiers and sex |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4D. |
Referral Patterns by CRG/ACRG, esp. ACRG3 |
Referral
rate per ACRG (for status) per PCP PMPY (using specialty codes and/or place
of service to differentiate PCP from specialist visits) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Parameter (UR/QI) |
Description |
|
|
5. |
ER Visit Incidence by CRG or ACRG |
Analyze by case-mix and by office visit frequency Emergency Room demographics, i.e., sort by age/sex
tiers |
Hospital Utilization Parameter (UR/QI) |
Hospital
Care by admit rate and by ALOS by Type of Specialty (e.g., Oxford’s Room
Codes) by CRG or ACRG Note:
These Reports have excluded, to the extent possible maternity and obvious
trauma. Also,
where appropriate, Medical is differentiated from Surgical |
|
|
6A. |
Hospital Utilization: Admission Incidence by CRG or ACRG |
Hospital
admission rate by CRG or ACRG by doctor a) E.G.,
examine cases with 1 - 2 day stay - determine if the hospitalization could
have been avoided (See Ambulatory
Sensitive Conditions). |
|
6B. |
Hospital Utilization: days/1000 and ALOS by CRG or ACRG |
Days
per 1,000 members and average hospital length of stay (ALOS) by CRG or ACRG
by doctor |
|
6C. |
Hospital Utilization Index by CRG or ACRG |
A
Composite of Hospital admission rates and ALOS by CRG or ACRG by doctor |
Second Level
Analysis and Action Planning
|
Parameter
(Accessibility) |
Description |
|
|
“Someone Drop the Ball”? |
|
|
|
1A. |
“Medical Home” Report |
PMPY
Office visit accessibility as compared with the peer groups’ averages by ACRG |
|
1B. |
“Leakage”
Analysis Report
|
Facility and
Professional Components of Hospitalizations and Referrals that occur to
Non-par (Out of Network [OON]) providers per ACRG per PCP PMPY |
|
1C. |
Unmet Needs Indicator Report |
Frequent
Flyer Report (E.G., > 2 hospitalizations and/or E.R. visits, >5 O.V,
> 6 Rx) by CRG or ACRG by doctor |
|
1D. |
Readmissions |
Inpatient
Readmission Study Using the CRG or ACRG Construct to demonstrate the
utilization by types of inpatient service[7]. |
|
Parameter (High
Cost Focus) |
Description |
|
|
2. |
Catastrophic
patients By Admits / CGR or ACRG |
Analyze > $50,000 cases by case-mix and by office visit frequency |
|
Parameter
(Effecting Change) |
Description |
|
|
3A. |
HEDIS and Secondary Prevention Report Using Targeted CRGs |
The
essence of NCQA and other regulatory bodies is to identify opportunities and
then effect change. CRGs are an ideal
tool for that purpose. These would
include Preventive Medicine Type Care parameters, e.g., Diabetic Retinal
Examinations |
|
3B. |
Significant Clinical Instability or Deterioration |
Variances with reference to Industry Expectations
for Disease Stability (i.e., change in SOI in CRGs that vary by a preset amount, for instance, > 10%,
over a period) |
|
3C. |
Preventable Condition by CRG/ACRG—QI Focused Study on “Ambulatory
Sensitive Conditions” |
Correlation analysis to look at the antecedent and/or follow-up care
and change in SOI . Example 1: Pristine and complicated asthma ER/Admit with or
without a proximate office visit (O.V.) for a respiratory condition or
treatment. Example 2: Failure to keep an O.V. after discharge for depression or mental
disturbance. |
|
Parameter
(Tracking) |
Description |
|
|
4A |
MDC, EPC, EDC, PCD, and CRG/ACRG by doctor, reported PMPM (MEEPC) |
a.
Average Surgical / Medical Admits by MEEPC b.
ALOS by Surgical / Medical / Total by MEEPC c.
Ave. Total Charges with Surgical / Medical Breakdown by MEEPC |
|
4B. |
CRG/ACRG by Subclass, that is by Severity of Illness (SOI) Subclass – all by
doctor, reported per year |
a.
Average Surgical / Medical Admits by MEEPC by SOI Subclass b.
ALOS by Surgical / Medical / Total by MEEPC by SOI Subclass a.
Ave. Total Charges with Surgical / Medical Breakdown by MEEPC by SOI
Subclass |
|
4C. |
MEEPC by Specialty/Service |
a.
Type of service[8] |
Third Level Analysis and Action
Steps (Advanced Techniques in
Treatment Management)
|
Parameter |
Description |
|
|
1. |
Reinsurance Threshold |
Large Cases:
User can plug in a threshold amount and evaluate the effects of the
reinsurance. |
|
2. |
Longitudinal
Perspective
|
Comparative
study of all care over time, regardless of setting by CRG/ACRG |
|
3. |
Case and Disease Management |
CRGs or ACRGs becomes the context for case identification and
tracking and they become the standard unit of measurement, monitoring and
disease management (3m) |
|
4. |
Cohort Study: Disease Progression |
Progress and opportunities in disease management are revealed by
changed in CRG over time in population subsets[9]. Diseases combinations such as depression
and other chronic illnesses. |
|
5. |
Disease and Case Mgm’t Initiatives |
Appropriate for the more advanced [E.G., 6-9], less stable or
deteriorating SOI levels[10] |
|
6. |
Outcome Assessment |
CRGs or ACRGs |